<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.physics Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics</link>
  <description>Physical laws, properties, etc.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: From Where the WTC Nutbaggery Starts - Delusional Mind of Ironhead</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/90afc9b91fcf9cc9/8eeedf9786e78e64?show_docid=8eeedf9786e78e64</link>
  <description>
  When you are looking at hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete crashing &lt;br&gt; together at high speed, the only significant term is what you quaintly call &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;stationary momentum&amp;quot;, or more accurately the exchange of momentum. &lt;br&gt; As I have explained three times now, this is very, very easy to model. &lt;br&gt; Previously I have just given you the equation, now I will spell it out for
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/90afc9b91fcf9cc9/8eeedf9786e78e64?show_docid=8eeedf9786e78e64</guid>
  <author>
  webbfam...@diespamdieoptusnet.com.au
  (Peter Webb)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:41:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two paths to a Type Ia supernova?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9111c17c82c2b72d/347c99196a2fb0fd?show_docid=347c99196a2fb0fd</link>
  <description>
  For the theory, I don&#39;t know what else I can say beyond what I&#39;ve &lt;br&gt; already said. &lt;br&gt; As for observation, the couple of blasts already identified as possible &lt;br&gt; dual-white-dwarf SN Ia&#39;s, where identified because of their extra &lt;br&gt; luminosity. &lt;br&gt; I agree with this, my feeling is most SN Ia&#39;s are standard gas-accretion
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9111c17c82c2b72d/347c99196a2fb0fd?show_docid=347c99196a2fb0fd</guid>
  <author>
  bbb...@spammenot.yahoo.com
  (Yousuf Khan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:26:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The perpetual calendar</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cebdd8416317edd/c3d8a68982c7ad27?show_docid=c3d8a68982c7ad27</link>
  <description>
  The reason that some posters mentioned the 28-hour day is that &lt;br&gt; it can be implemented simply by taking one of the 24-hour days &lt;br&gt; of the week and divide it into sixths, giving four hours each to the &lt;br&gt; other six days of the week. &lt;br&gt; The first website to give this proposal is actually the following &lt;br&gt; link: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.dbeat.com/28/?dupe&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cebdd8416317edd/c3d8a68982c7ad27?show_docid=c3d8a68982c7ad27</guid>
  <author>
  lwal...@lausd.net
  (Transfer Principle)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:24:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 1 billion green toilets for india?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c1c3b2438c29236f/97da1f6522ed9e2d?show_docid=97da1f6522ed9e2d</link>
  <description>
  I am surprised to see that &amp;quot;Robert Higgins&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; is all bent out of shape about &amp;quot;green toilets&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Maybe Bobby is concerned that he will lose a way &lt;br&gt; to dispose of evidence when raided by the DEA.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c1c3b2438c29236f/97da1f6522ed9e2d?show_docid=97da1f6522ed9e2d</guid>
  <author>
  xprivatn...@mailinator.com
  (Tom Potter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:22:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 1 billion green toilets for india?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c1c3b2438c29236f/7eba345f0ad66335?show_docid=7eba345f0ad66335</link>
  <description>
  A couple of more positive points. &lt;br&gt; Plants are biodegradable, &lt;br&gt; whereas porcelain is not, &lt;br&gt; and plants are warm to the touch and soft, &lt;br&gt; therefore less apt to harm someone, &lt;br&gt; whereas porcelain is hard and cold. &lt;br&gt; Who knows how many babies &lt;br&gt; scooting around in strollers &lt;br&gt; have banged their heads on heads. &lt;br&gt; As &amp;quot;harmony&amp;quot; suggests,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c1c3b2438c29236f/7eba345f0ad66335?show_docid=7eba345f0ad66335</guid>
  <author>
  xprivatn...@mailinator.com
  (Tom Potter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:18:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Einstein was right (again) - Read and weep kooks</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/e6bb7912ee50ea9c/34f518b3e73c048b?show_docid=34f518b3e73c048b</link>
  <description>
  It appears that my pal &amp;quot;Robert Higgins&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; is all bent out of shape because &lt;br&gt; I posted that Jews promote the Urban Legend &lt;br&gt; that they are &amp;quot;Virtuous Victims&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; in order to rationalize the fact that &lt;br&gt; they have come into conflict with &lt;br&gt; all of neighbors throughout history. &lt;br&gt; It seems to me, &lt;br&gt; that promoting the legend that they are &amp;quot;Virtuous Victim&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/e6bb7912ee50ea9c/34f518b3e73c048b?show_docid=34f518b3e73c048b</guid>
  <author>
  xprivatn...@mailinator.com
  (Tom Potter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:21:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Why does a golf ball have dimples?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/766333f74b8d9c74/0c5cca8617177b91?show_docid=0c5cca8617177b91</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://is.gd/ax1Rj&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/766333f74b8d9c74/0c5cca8617177b91?show_docid=0c5cca8617177b91</guid>
  <author>
  xprivatn...@mailinator.com
  (Tom Potter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:13:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Was Einstein indeed &quot;Very Great&quot;?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ece14b1577855277/2b00c06c375d042f?show_docid=2b00c06c375d042f</link>
  <description>
  Note that whereas Maxwell was a pioneer in physics, &lt;br&gt; Einstein copied the works of others, &lt;br&gt; and gave little or no credit to the originators, &lt;br&gt; and note that whereas most of Einstein&#39;s works &lt;br&gt; generate more heat than light, &lt;br&gt; and diverts time, money and minds &lt;br&gt; that could be better applied to things like &lt;br&gt; DNA, elctronics, mechanics, medicine, etc.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ece14b1577855277/2b00c06c375d042f?show_docid=2b00c06c375d042f</guid>
  <author>
  xprivatn...@mailinator.com
  (Tom Potter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:08:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: CLIMATE-GATE, RELATIVITY-GATE, ENTROPY-GATE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bfd774f7428a30ea/bc6ed321bad388f8?show_docid=bc6ed321bad388f8</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/03/10/2010-03-10_cerns_large_hadron_collider_worlds_largest_atomsmasher_needs_to_be_shut_down_for.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Scientists have made a major discovery using the Large Hadron &lt;br&gt; Collider, the world&#39;s largest atom-smasher, a $5 billion feat of &lt;br&gt; engineering built to re-create conditions in the universe just after
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bfd774f7428a30ea/bc6ed321bad388f8?show_docid=bc6ed321bad388f8</guid>
  <author>
  pva...@yahoo.com
  (Pentcho Valev)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:22:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>What is this figure called? A wedge? #517 Correcting Math</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2b0ab0a7a9ba609c/6cd167f70f72e41f?show_docid=6cd167f70f72e41f</link>
  <description>
  Alright, I confirmed my suspicions that a tetrahedron in 3D is a no-go &lt;br&gt; as the best tiler &lt;br&gt; because of obvious inability to form a solid packing with no gaps in &lt;br&gt; between. &lt;br&gt; I found this website to show me the densest tetrahedron packing: &lt;br&gt; --- quoting from wolfram --- &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/DensestTetrahedraPacking/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2b0ab0a7a9ba609c/6cd167f70f72e41f?show_docid=6cd167f70f72e41f</guid>
  <author>
  plutonium.archime...@gmail.com
  (Archimedes Plutonium)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:21:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can&#39;t be serious.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ffd25c691881f7fb/a0a770d4fbdbd318?show_docid=a0a770d4fbdbd318</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_pendulum_clock&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; No... More like this: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_oscillator&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Torsion pendulum &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node139.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ffd25c691881f7fb/a0a770d4fbdbd318?show_docid=a0a770d4fbdbd318</guid>
  <author>
  suzysewns...@yahoo.com.au
  (Sue...)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:17:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A better new definition for the real *single* photon energy emission plus a simple experiment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/239638ef6b583911/2182a743a941a7f1?show_docid=2182a743a941a7f1</link>
  <description>
  and now i found even a betterdefinition of my above suggested n &lt;br&gt; since the Planck time is about &lt;br&gt; 5 exp-44 &lt;br&gt; that should be my better definition of n &lt;br&gt; so &lt;br&gt; =========================== &lt;br&gt; E min photon = h f times 5 exp-44 &lt;br&gt; ============================ &lt;br&gt; explantions will come later &lt;br&gt; 14-03-2010 &lt;br&gt; ATB &lt;br&gt; Y.Porat &lt;br&gt; -------------------
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/239638ef6b583911/2182a743a941a7f1?show_docid=2182a743a941a7f1</guid>
  <author>
  y.y.po...@gmail.com
  (Y.Porat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:03:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The perpetual calendar</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cebdd8416317edd/a63070d01c0e23c9?show_docid=a63070d01c0e23c9</link>
  <description>
  I think the problem jmfbah has when we fall back is that she feels &lt;br&gt; tired an hour before bedtime. That&#39;s why for her, Year Round &lt;br&gt; Standard Time is the best. &lt;br&gt; Cheryl points out how to her, the fall back clock shift isn&#39;t as bad &lt;br&gt; as &lt;br&gt; the spring forward clock shift. This reminds me of a classic joke &lt;br&gt; about &lt;br&gt; how to make springing forward feel more like falling back:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cebdd8416317edd/a63070d01c0e23c9?show_docid=a63070d01c0e23c9</guid>
  <author>
  lwal...@lausd.net
  (Transfer Principle)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:59:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS OR WITH ITSELF?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9670a0487f0eedda/ed17ac3fd942ce50?show_docid=ed17ac3fd942ce50</link>
  <description>
  Philosophers of science giving advice about inconsistent theories (IN &lt;br&gt; CAPITALS): &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/brhoads/www/book/chapt1.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Internal inconsistency is a defect in a theory that gives grounds for &lt;br&gt; seeking a better theory. Proving that a theory is inconsistent has the &lt;br&gt; same import as showing that it has false empirical consequences:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9670a0487f0eedda/ed17ac3fd942ce50?show_docid=ed17ac3fd942ce50</guid>
  <author>
  pva...@yahoo.com
  (Pentcho Valev)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:57:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Quantum Gravity 361.3: Germany Relates Memory, QCD, Electroweak Interaction, Fibonacci Numbers, Golden Mean, Neutrinos</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/93f4239a31e1a0f2/c585a5b1478bdf54?show_docid=c585a5b1478bdf54</link>
  <description>
  From Osher Doctorow &lt;br&gt; I happen to have found this paper while comparing Lagrangians for QED, &lt;br&gt; QCD, Electroweak Interaction, Weak and Strong Interactions: &lt;br&gt; 1) Adisorn Adulpravitchai, Alexander Blum, Werner Rodejohann, &amp;quot;Golden &lt;br&gt; ratio prediction for solar neutrino mixing,&amp;quot; Max-Planck-Institut fur &lt;br&gt; kernphysik Heidelberg Germany, 15 pages, arXiv: 0903.0531 v2 [hep-ph]
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/93f4239a31e1a0f2/c585a5b1478bdf54?show_docid=c585a5b1478bdf54</guid>
  <author>
  mdocto...@ca.rr.com
  (OsherD)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:56:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
