<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics</id>
  <title type="text">sci.physics Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Physical laws, properties, etc.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.physics/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.physics feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-12T04:00:43Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.ag" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inertial</name>
  <email>relativ...@rest.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T04:00:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/31d5f3ec8c4933bd/021a30da2ee95caa?show_docid=021a30da2ee95caa</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/31d5f3ec8c4933bd/021a30da2ee95caa?show_docid=021a30da2ee95caa"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Aether flowing over particles and their fields surrounding them</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Better question for him is .. haven&#39;t you *stopped* drinking yet? Mind you &lt;br&gt; .. it sounds most like some sort of psychedelic hallucinogen to me.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inertial</name>
  <email>relativ...@rest.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:59:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/c668cb0be191dff0?show_docid=c668cb0be191dff0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/c668cb0be191dff0?show_docid=c668cb0be191dff0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can&#39;t be serious.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m just describing LET to you .. as it is clear you have no idea what it is &lt;br&gt; about .. first you say it has Galilean transforms giving anistropic light &lt;br&gt; and Lorentz transforms do not apply, then you claim there are no Galilean &lt;br&gt; transforms in it at all, so I&#39;m assuming you then now think it has Lorentz
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>knews4u2c...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:56:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cd4c6d22e48442c/0f4b7e00f6adeec5?show_docid=0f4b7e00f6adeec5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cd4c6d22e48442c/0f4b7e00f6adeec5?show_docid=0f4b7e00f6adeec5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Ultimate 9-11 Insider</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=bush+securacom+wtc&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bill Penrose</name>
  <email>dangerousb...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:56:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/05dd79b6823a5a1b/8e0e1f28cfe4dd8f?show_docid=8e0e1f28cfe4dd8f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/05dd79b6823a5a1b/8e0e1f28cfe4dd8f?show_docid=8e0e1f28cfe4dd8f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Build a better cooker than a pressure cooker or infrared oven?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  There&#39;s nothing quite so satisfactory in terms of speed and thorough &lt;br&gt; cooking as a subcritical mass of U-235 in the shape of a donut. &lt;br&gt; Pushing food through the hole causes the core to become momentarily &lt;br&gt; critical, heating the food to any desired temperature in nanoseconds. &lt;br&gt; A few minutes for the short-lived nuclides to decay, and it&#39;s ready
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>knews4u2c...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:54:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/90afc9b91fcf9cc9/a1b64bbbf1a36357?show_docid=a1b64bbbf1a36357</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/90afc9b91fcf9cc9/a1b64bbbf1a36357?show_docid=a1b64bbbf1a36357"/>
  <title type="text">Re: From Where the WTC Demo Evidence Starts - Spheres</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mar 11, 7:27 pm, Ioonynrod &amp;lt;iarn...@yahoo.com&amp;gt; continued to spew &lt;br&gt; and cannot refute: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjAviEG20dg&amp;feature=related&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=28G&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;ei=NbqZS9S0BIiqtgO28oymCw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spell&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CAUQBSgA&amp;q=bush+nazi+prescott&amp;spell=1&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inertial</name>
  <email>relativ...@rest.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:54:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/0b3a3da31adc9b3b?show_docid=0b3a3da31adc9b3b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/0b3a3da31adc9b3b?show_docid=0b3a3da31adc9b3b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can&#39;t be serious.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Indeed it can. But we observe it to have a particular value in our &lt;br&gt; universe. &lt;br&gt; All equivalent as long as c is finite &lt;br&gt; Yes .. it just doesn&#39;t really matter that much what particular value it has. &lt;br&gt; But it does have a particular value in our universe &lt;br&gt; The geometry models what we find happens physically. Why you insist there
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Marvin the Martian</name>
  <email>mar...@ontomars.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:54:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ece14b1577855277/9f0651891ac6beb1?show_docid=9f0651891ac6beb1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ece14b1577855277/9f0651891ac6beb1?show_docid=9f0651891ac6beb1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Was Einstein indeed &quot;Very Great&quot;?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  GR has nothing to do with QM. And his theory of gravity is more of a &lt;br&gt; description of gravity, and not a theory. &lt;br&gt; His contributions were using Dirac&#39;s quantum theory to explain the photo- &lt;br&gt; electric effect, and making really bad arguments based on his personal &lt;br&gt; beliefs and biases against QM. If that makes him a founder, well...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>eric gisse</name>
  <email>jowr.pi.nos...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:50:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/e6bb7912ee50ea9c/328311bf19b590de?show_docid=328311bf19b590de</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/e6bb7912ee50ea9c/328311bf19b590de?show_docid=328311bf19b590de"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Einstein was right (again) - Read and weep kooks</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Bullet cluster.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Don Stockbauer</name>
  <email>donstockba...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:48:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/31d5f3ec8c4933bd/b7d1984f0d8cff27?show_docid=b7d1984f0d8cff27</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/31d5f3ec8c4933bd/b7d1984f0d8cff27?show_docid=b7d1984f0d8cff27"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Aether flowing over particles and their fields surrounding them</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Have you been drinking again?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Huang</name>
  <email>huangxienc...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:44:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/1bb4135deeef0554/079c333b5a5d8d75?show_docid=079c333b5a5d8d75</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/1bb4135deeef0554/079c333b5a5d8d75?show_docid=079c333b5a5d8d75"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Time?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Rulers and yardsticks measure length, and by making such measurements &lt;br&gt; we are making simple observations. Clocks measure time, and by using &lt;br&gt; clocks we observe time in a fashion which allows for science to &lt;br&gt; function properly and explain the natural world around us. &lt;br&gt; If Newton were to hear you say such things he would certainly kick
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dono.</name>
  <email>sa...@comcast.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:41:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/0aa683eebc1810fb?show_docid=0aa683eebc1810fb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/0aa683eebc1810fb?show_docid=0aa683eebc1810fb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can&#39;t be serious.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You were always borderline autistic. Based on the above, it is clear &lt;br&gt; that you are downright insane.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>James</name>
  <email>kingko...@iglou.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:39:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3b85cee7242dcc05/7d6d8dc384511760?show_docid=7d6d8dc384511760</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3b85cee7242dcc05/7d6d8dc384511760?show_docid=7d6d8dc384511760"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The case against the hockey stick</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This seems to indicate that when you can&#39;t make a case, just create a &lt;br&gt; hoax. The far left still trys to bask in this scam as they always do. &lt;br&gt; Fake but accurate. &lt;br&gt; Stephen McIntyre should be nominated for the Nobel prize. &lt;br&gt; Good piece.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>eric gisse</name>
  <email>jowr.pi.nos...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:35:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/67c05d9264d8839c/233551acef7d9aa8?show_docid=233551acef7d9aa8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/67c05d9264d8839c/233551acef7d9aa8?show_docid=233551acef7d9aa8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is there any contradiction here?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  No.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Stowe</name>
  <email>theaether...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:32:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/ec0e4d20c2e1b4a9?show_docid=ec0e4d20c2e1b4a9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7984eb302a85183b/ec0e4d20c2e1b4a9?show_docid=ec0e4d20c2e1b4a9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can&#39;t be serious.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I wasn&#39;t going to bother with a reply since we have gone round &amp;amp; round &lt;br&gt; on this very point. I find your argument without merit and I&#39;m &lt;br&gt; certain that you mind is made up. Why act like kid and continuously &lt;br&gt; and say no it ain&#39;t, yes it is??? &lt;br&gt; In minkowski math c can be any finite value. As Tom Roberts would
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Iarnrod</name>
  <email>iarn...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T03:29:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cd4c6d22e48442c/342512781059a3a2?show_docid=342512781059a3a2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ag/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/8cd4c6d22e48442c/342512781059a3a2?show_docid=342512781059a3a2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Ultimate 9-11 Kook</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mar 11, 8:00 pm, knowsknothing...@jew-hating-in bred-goober.com &lt;br&gt; exposed his idiocy to the world: &lt;br&gt; It didn&#39;t, you know, and also Marvin Bush was not an officer in it. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll bet you &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; differently, kook! Another lie from &lt;br&gt; knowsknothing!
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
