ccnet-devel Google Group

Re: [ccnet-devel] Target framework for CruiseControl.NET

daniel.na...@gmail.com (Daniel Nauck) — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:08:39 UT

Hello,
i'm also ok with this change. I'll try to "reactivate" my linux/mono
build server again, so we can ensure that ccnet will be Mono compatible.
Daniel
Am 14.03.2010 04:44, schrieb Craig Sutherland:

Re: [ccnet-devel] Target framework for CruiseControl.NET

dave...@gmail.com (David Cameron) — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:20:07 UT

None from me. Sounds good.
I'm trying to think about what the impact of switching the target is:
+ we can use Linq expressions in source code
+ we can use all the new 3.5 classes
? it will run on the same run-time
- users need the new base class library
I was thinking the same thing lately. We should move to 3.5 so that the

Target framework for CruiseControl.NET

cj.sutherl...@xtra.co.nz (Craig Sutherland) — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:44:56 UT

Hi all,
I would like to change the version of the .NET framework that we
target. Currently CruiseControl.NET only targets .NET 2.0. .NET 2.0
was originally released in 2005. Since then .NET 3.5 was released in
2007 and .NET 4 is due to be released this year. Additionally, Mono
fully supports .NET 3.5 (with the exception of WF, WPF and parts of

Email timeout

mali...@gmail.com (Martin Aliger) — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:46:54 UT

Hello,
I migrated our ccnet to new server and updated to 1.5 CTP version
(from pretty old 1.1). We are having strange email timeout problems
now. I even JIRAed a request CCNET-1821 (but it will not help anyway
it seems)
Here is excerpt from the log.
There was 2 projects running simultaniously and several other polling

Fwd: scenario tests

ruben.will...@gmail.com (Ruben Willems) — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:35:30 UT

Hi
I just updated the integration tests at my pc, and finetuned it a bit
I took CCNet-1835 as test-case (pun intented) and I can simulate it
perfectly
now just looking where the bug is ....
That is harder ...
keeping you posted
with kind regards
Ruben Willems
---------- Forwarded message ----------
To: ccnet-devel <ccnet-devel@googlegroups.com>

Bugs in SCM plugin for CM Synergy

lange...@gmail.com (Bas Peeters) — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:29:30 UT

Hi,
I found some bugs in the SCM plugin for CM Synergy.
1) CCNet crashes if the synergy database ID contains numbers
2) Tasks are always integrated even when the build fails
3) The connection with Synergy is not properly closed
I entered these bugs in Jira under CCNET-1468, CCNET-1838 and CCNET-1839.

CCNET-1828: SVN TagOnSuccess working copy

mcdon....@gmail.com (mcdon) — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:09:15 UT

I think it would be useful to have an option for TagOnSuccess to
always use the working copy when creating a tag. I use the value of
CCNetLabel to update my AssemblyInfo.cs files with a new version
number during a build. When creating a tag I would like the tag to
include the version number that was generated at that time. Normally

scenario tests

ruben.will...@gmail.com (Ruben Willems) — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:36:09 UT

Hi all
From revision 1.5.6931.1 on, I added a scenario tests.
The idea is to run ccnet as part of the nunit test cycle
--> running tests with the real objects, and not mocks / stubs
so testing real config and scenario's
I want to prevent regression with this, because our current unit tests do
not cover everything.

Re: [ccnet-devel] Tweaked XSL for MSTest 2008

ruben.will...@gmail.com (Ruben Willems) — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:22:08 UT

Hi
thanks for the tweak.
I made some small changes to it, and committed it to the trunk.
--> removed the <pre> so that errormessages wrap
--> gave a background color on the errormessage and the stack trace
with kind regards
Ruben Willems

Tweaked XSL for MSTest 2008

ian.glo...@gmail.com (Ian) — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:00:33 UT

Hi
In the process of setting up CC.net for a project I ended tweaking a
lot of the stylesheet for displaying results from MSTest. I was
wondering if there was an interest in incorporating the changes back
into the project?
The extra features are:
- more result categories reported (timeout and aborted)

Fwd: ccnet 1826 : replace default password for admin page with empty one, and check on empty password

dave...@gmail.com (David Cameron) — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:21:43 UT

Forwarding to ccnet-devel as a public record of the discussion/decision.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
one, and check on empty password
To: Dave Cameron <dave...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dna (Daniel Mono Germany)" <d...@mono-project.de>, Craig & Sammi
Sutherland <cj.sutherl...@xtra.co.nz>, Daniel <dhom...@gmail.com>

Re: [ccnet-devel] Best place to give general feedback or Jira?

dave...@gmail.com (Dave Cameron) — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:39:18 UT

John, the priority is to capture the information so any channel is
better than none.
Having said that, we have found JIRA And the mailing list work better
in different situations. JIRA works bestwhen a change or bug is well
understood and ready to be worked on. The mailing list is preferred
for discussions of ideas or confirmation of whether behaviours are

Labeling: Build labelling and email subject

cinnamondon...@googlemail.com (CinnamonDonkey) — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:43:18 UT

Hi All,
I have a project configured which generates its version number mid-
way
through the build process. This means that the version number is not
available pre-build. My understanding is that CC.Net expects the
label
to be available before the build process begins :(
As a result this project it is not labelled correctly with a version

Re: [ccnet-devel] Re: Security Configuration CC.NET 1.5 SP1

daniel.na...@gmail.com (Daniel Nauck) — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:30:21 UT

Hi,
please don't mix up CCNet internal security and the Windows
ACLs/permissions for the webdashboard.
1.) ASP.NET WebDashboard windows acls/permissions
The user thats runs the "ASP.NET AppPool" for the webdashboard needs
write permissions to the physical folder of the webdashboard.
Normally its the NETWORK_SERVICE user.

Re: Security Configuration CC.NET 1.5 SP1

dave.cars...@gmail.com (Dave Carson) — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:28:46 UT

Agreed - I raised a similar (but different) issue on the ccnet-user
group: [link]
No feedback yet though.
Dave